chipclemmer.com

The Blog

Here I will post certain articles that I have selected from the web and comment on them as well as write short articles on current events.

10/27/07

Here's one that got me howling with laughter from Dr. Jack Wheeler at To The Point News:

AN UPDATE ON CANADA’S ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION CRISIS
Written by To The Point, Inc.   
Friday, 26 October 2007

Dispatch from The Manitoba Herald, Canada, October 20, 2008.

With an American military victory achieved in Iraq, the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton imploding after an unending stream of scandals, House Speaker Pelosi under indictment for treason, and Democrats facing total disaster in the upcoming elections, the flood of American liberals sneaking across the border into Canada has intensified in the past week, sparking calls for increased patrols to stop the illegal immigration.

Canadian border farmers say it's not uncommon to see dozens of sociology professors, animal-rights activists and same-sex couples crossing their fields at night. "I went out to milk the cows the other day, and there was a Hollywood producer huddled in the barn," said Manitoba farmer Red Greenfield, whose acreage borders North Dakota. "The producer was cold, exhausted and hungry. He asked me if I could spare a latté and some free-range chicken.  When I said I didn't have any, he left. Didn't even get a chance to show him my screenplay, eh?"

In an effort to stop the illegal aliens, Greenfield erected higher fences, but the liberals scaled them. So he tried installing speakers that blare Rush Limbaugh across the fields. "Not real effective," he said. "The liberals still got through, and Rush annoyed the cows so much they wouldn't give milk."

Officials are particularly concerned about smugglers who meet liberals near the Canadian border, pack them into Volvo station wagons, drive them across the border and leave them to fend for themselves. "A lot of these people are not prepared for rugged conditions," an Ontario border patrolman said. "I found one carload without a drop of drinking water. "They did have a nice little Napa Valley cabernet, though."

When liberals are caught, they're sent back across the border, often wailing loudly that they fear retribution from conservatives. Rumors have been circulating about the Bush administration establishing re-education camps in which liberals will be forced to drink domestic beer and watch NASCAR races.

In recent days, liberals have turned to sometimes-ingenious ways of crossing the border. Some have taken to posing as senior citizens on bus trips to buy cheap Canadian prescription drugs. After catching a half-dozen young vegans disguised in powdered wigs, Canadian immigration authorities began stopping buses and quizzing the supposed senior-citizen passengers on Perry Como and Rosemary Clooney hits to prove they were alive in the '50s. "If they can't identify the accordion player on The Lawrence Welk Show, we get suspicious about their age," an official said.  Canadian citizens have complained that the illegal immigrants are creating an organic-broccoli shortage and renting all the good Susan Sarandon movies.

"I feel sorry for American liberals, but the Canadian economy just can't support them," an Ottawa resident said. "How many art-history majors or sociology professors does one country need?"

Wouldn't it be great if this story turned out to be true? It woud be so nice to give the Left in this country a taste of their own medicine.

7/12/2007

Making A Statement
by Chip

One thing Liberals love to do is make a statement. It makes them feel good, and helps relieve them of their guilt trips. You hear all about the enlightened ones driving around in their Priuses, because they are "making a statement." It doesn't matter that they live in McMansions with hot tubs, heated pools, and air conditioners set on 72 degrees, sucking up more energy each month than us ignorant "unwashed masses" use in a year. (Al Gore and his three big homes and private jet, while he's guru of the Communist global warming crowd). Of course, the more conservative we are, the more ignorant and unwashed we are too. The statement is, "Look at me. I'm important. I care." I'm sure it makes them feel good as they wear their "compassion and concern for all mankind" on their sleeves for all of us to see. So what? How about putting your money where your mouth is instead of "making a statement."

Yes I know, many of you purchase so called "green energy" at a premium price. You'd like to have all energy be green energy. Then you'd be the only people that could afford electricity beyond bare bones usage. That's ok though. That means that since the rest of us mere mortals wouldn't be able to afford the electricity needed to cool our homes in the summer, there would be more electricity available for you. Make and keep us miserable. It's a page right out of Karl Marx.

Now to be fair, there are a large number of environmentally conscious people that really do more than make a statement, and to those people I offer my thanks and commend you for your efforts. I ask those people to convince the wealthy and upper middle class Socialist Elite Useful Idiots and Fellow Travellers to stop wearing their ideology on their sleeves and stop this "do as I say not as I do" hypocrisy that is so common among the "enlightened ones."

Let's get back to hybrid cars for a minute. First of all, let me make something clear. I am not against hybrid technology. I'm sure that in the future it will be a viable technology used in the transportation industry. However, I'm not going to embrace it at this time for a variety of reasons, mainly, because of the problem with the batteries. There are plans in the works to start using lithium ion batteries in hybrid vehicles, and that should not only bring the price down, but will also make them environmentally friendly. Once that happens, the rules are different. Until that happens, however, in the big scheme of things, hybrids are not all that environmentally friendly. At this point I'm sure that you are questioning my sanity, but I'm basing my statement on research done by Edmunds, which is a consumer advocacy group specializing in automobiles.

One of the things Edmunds does is calculate the total environmental cost of all sorts of vehicles and break it down into how much it costs per mile driven over the life of the car. They take into consideration everything from cost of the vehicle, fuel economy, cost of the manufacturing of the vehicle, cost of the manufacturing of the components of the vehicle, to the cost of final disposal of the vehicle and/or it's various elements. With hybrids, this includes the manufacturing and disposal of the massive batteries used to drive the vehicle when it is in electric mode.

Currently, hybrid vehicles use nickle cadmium batteries. Nickel mining, smelting, and refining are some of the most environmentally damaging activities in the world. Taking the Prius for example, Toyota purchases over 2500 metric tons of nickel each year just to make the batteries. The nickel, which requires a huge amount of nickel ore in order to produce those metric tons is mined at a huge strip mine near Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. The mining and smelting process in Sudbury have created a zone around the facility that is basically devoid of life for several miles. NASA used the area years ago to test the moon rovers used in the Apollo program. The mine and smelter are responsible for a most of the acid rain that has caused a huge amount of damage throughout Eastern Canada and parts of Northern Europe. Of course that acid rain is blamed on the US by various environmental groups even though it comes from "enlightened" Socialist Canada, but that's a different story.

The smelted nickel is then loaded into huge cargo container ships, and shipped across the Atlantic where it is refined into 95% pure nickel at a plant in France. From there it is loaded back onto cargo container ships where it goes to China where it is made into nickel foam. That nickel foam is then loaded back into ships where it is sent to Japan and made into batteries. Most of those batteries are then loaded back onto container ships and sent to the US where they are installed into the Priuses that are made here in the United States.

Think about the environmental cost of the mining, the fuel cost of the ships involved, and the pollution costs in the manufacturing of the batteries, etc. Now think about the increased environmental costs as more and more people would switch over to hybrid cars. The fact that the batteries in a hybrid are currently only good for about 100,000 miles before they must be replaced to the tune of about $6,000 to $7,000 makes it unlikely that hybrid owners will replace the batteries instead of disposing of the vehicle. That means that they also have no resale value. Hybrids are therefore nothing but throw away vehicles. Yes, you can recover some of the environmental cost through the recycling of the steel and plastic components of the car but what about the cost of the disposal of the rest of the vehicle including the batteries? Batteries are considered hazardous material. The next time that you purchase a new battery for your car, notice that the service facility that you purchase it from charges you a hazardous material disposal fee in order to comply with federal environmental regulations.

According to Edmunds, the cost per mile of a hybrid is over $3 per mile to operate the vehicle over its approximate 100,000 mile life span. Ironically, the "Enlightens" arch enemy vehicle, the Hummer, costs a little less than $2 per mile over its approximate 300,000 mile lifespan. For real world types, a Scion xB's per mile cost is around a buck and a half, and smaller vehicles like a Scion cT or a Chevy Aveo are less than a dollar per mile driven over an approximate 200,000 mile vehicle lifespan. However, when you present these facts to Liberal Elites, they either completely ignore them, or they unashamedly resort to the, "yes, I know, but..." diatribe about how it's ok to be a hypocrite as long as you believe in the right things before they go into their boilerplate oral diarhea about Bush and the oil companies.

What they also don't tell you are the hidden two big reasons why the Liberal Elites love their hybrids: 1. They get a federal income tax break for purchasing one. This is interesting coming from the group of individuals that are all in favor of repealing the Bush tax cuts to the so called "rich." And 2. here in the Washington, DC area, they get to drive their hybrids in the HOV lanes without other passengers. The smug arrogant Elites, who know what's best for us than us, and are so superior in every way, at least in their mind, get to flaunt everything they stand for in regards to car pooling, because they are too good and their time is just too important to car pool. Don't you just love Malignant Narcissism?

Years ago when I was in college, and still a Liberal, I took an Environmental Biology course in order to fulfill the science requirement for my degree. The professor who taught the course believed very strongly in environmental causes, but he also instilled in us that there have to be practical solutions to protecting the environment, as well as actions speak louder than just making a statement. For example: He was married and had three children. He was also a full professor making a fairly decent salary. While he could have purchased a much larger home, he chose a smaller one, because it would use less energy. He also had it properly insulated and had top of the line storm doors and windows installed in order to conserve oil for heat and electricity for air conditioning. If it was cool enough outside in the summer, they opened the windows and turned on the fans rather than run the AC. His choice of home was also less than a mile from the campus. Rather than live farther out, he chose to live close to work.

He and his family had one car, a small station wagon that served them a variety of purposes. He would ride a bicycle to work, unless it was raining, snowing, icy, or too cold. Then, his wife would drive him, so that she could have the car for running errands or what have you. It was a practical solution. They found a way to only need one car, rather than having the "convenience" of two. They composted their garbage to use in their garden. They recycled the gray water from their sinks as irrigation water that was used in that garden. They used the safest pesticides they could. They did not find the organic thing to be practical. I remember one discussion in the lecture hall about organic food. This was in the early 1970s and the organic movement was just starting to become fashionable. One student posed the question, " Doctor, wouldn't it be better for mankind if all the food we consumed in this world was grown organically?" His answer, "No. There is much less yield per crop acre for organic rather than conventional. You would have a tremendous increase in world levels of starvation, and not just in the Third World. You would see a lot of people even here in the United States going to bed hungry every night, because of food shortages and cost."

This brings up an interesting point. Look how the Elites love their organic food markets where the price of food is sometimes twice what it is in a regular grocery store. Why? Because it shows us "little people" that they are more important than we are. Again, it's about appearances and "making a statement." If they had their way, they would also use rationing to control the amount and type of food that we consume as part of their quest for Totalitarian Socialist power over the rest of us. The best way to exact cooperation to an agenda is through starvation. Stalin did it, Mao did it, and Castro still does it. What do these three men have in common? What is the underlying philosophy belief system of the Liberal Elites? Communism! However, they disguise it by calling it "Progressivism." Communism is a dictatorship of the intellectual classes over the rest of us "mere mortals." It is not a revolution of the workers overthrowing the Capitalists. It is the intellectual classes enslaving the working classes as well as the Capitalists for their own absolute power. Is this what we want in America? I think not. Howver, we seem to be heading in that direction thanks to the slow march toward that ideology perpetuated by the Elites in academia, the media, our entertainment industries, our government, and the guilt ridden super educated upper middle classes and wealthy that are Communism's Fellow Travellers and Useful Idiots.

5/26/2007

Here's a good one from Lee Ellis, a retired journalist and narrator, formerly with both CBS and Gannett (USA Weekend). He is also a combat veteran of WWII, having fought in the South Pacific invasions. Lee interviewed Ronald Reagan as an actor and then later working to help him become Governor of California. This article was posted on therant.us.

Perpetuation of Puerile Politics & Poisonous Propaganda
Lee Ellis
May 23, 2007

 
A letter in my local newspaper starts with "Shame on Representative Mary Bono for defying the demands of the American people to end the Iraq disaster."
 
Disaster?
 
I always thought that we had created a success in Iraq by having our armed forces in the heart of the Middle East with a new giant embassy loaded with all kinds of listening devices, thus helping to prevent further attacks on the United States.

I guess it depends on what you consider success. Personally, I think that our successes in Iraq have been too modest, because of the politically correct way that we have fought this very important battle in the war on terrorism. We keep hearing the Left whining about how we need to go after bin Laden, but even bin Laden has stated that Iraq is the centerpiece of the war. How convenient it is for the Left to forget that. Then again, they love to rewrite history a la Howard Zinn, just like how Stalin's minions rewrote Russian history to serve their ideology. Of course, it's pretty damn obvious today that Liberals are no longer Liberals, but are nothing but opportunistic Communists. We could have been out of there a long time ago, if we had taken the completely politically incorrect position that the way to ensure security from Radical Islam would have been to "cauterize the Hydra" so to speak. We should have used all the conventional firepower of the US Military, and sent Iraq, Iran, Syria, Afghanistan, and Palestine back into the stone age. Lee is right, however, in regards to the super high tech embassy being instrumental in helping prevent attacks on the US that could have occurred following 9/11. Now when did you hear about the embassy in the Communist controlled MSM? I don't remember hearing much about it. The silence is deafening. Gee, I wonder why...

In addition to creating this island of Freedom in the Middle East, we were also able to rid the world of a corrupt despot who had used WMDs on his own people and had paid each suicide bomber's family an award of $25,000. If Saddam Hussein were still in charge, I would hate to think of where his WMDs would be landing today instead of being secretly hidden in Syria, about which many officials have logically speculated. Saddam's secret financing of terrorism would have doubled the amount now financed by Iran and Syria.

I agree with Lee. Iraq is an island of freedom in the Middle East, but it is a tentative one. It could collapse at a moment's notice. We didn't spend enough time destroying the underlying terrorist infrastructure, nor did we secure the borders to prevent the terrorists who we are mostly engaging from coming across the borders from Syria, Yemen, and Iran.

 Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer and other George Soros types of Democrats have been claiming in the broadcast media that George Bush and his fellow Republicans are not obeying the wishes of "the American people" in waging the war against all terrorists. Have you noticed that some Socialist-Democrat is always reminding us that "the American people" gave the Democrat Party the majority rule in Congress with their 2006 vote? Thus these Democrats, including John Murtha (D-PA) and John Conyers (D-MI), say "the American people" demand that our President leave Iraq immediately and that Bush change his strategy to meet the demands of this new majority!  I could have sworn that the Democrats slipped in with just a tiny majority, and that if just one Democrat were to change parties, our V.P. Dick Cheney would have the tie vote! 
 
Senator Joe Lieberman, are you listening?

First of all, these George Soros Democrats are not Socialists. They are de facto Communists. They are the Fellow Travelers of the radical Communist movement that emerged in the 1960s as a product of the Cultural Marxism movement that planted the seeds of the slow march toward Communism in America in the 1920s with die hard Marxists like Roger Baldwin, Margaret Sanger, Felix Frankfurter, and John Dewey. They are the de facto bastard children of Antonio Gramsci, the Italian Communist who took Karl Marx's economic theories and developed a plan to supplant them into the Western Judeo-Christian based (no, not the Religious Right) culture in order to destroy it from within. They are the de facto bastard children of Herbert Marcuse and Phillipe Adorno of the Frankfurt School, who took Gramsci's plan and fused it with Sigmund Freud's techniques of psychological control, so that the plan would be very difficult, or almost impossible to resist. Members of the Frankfurt school fled Germany for their lives during Hitler's rise to power in the 1930s and settled in the US, acquiring prominent positions in American universities like Cornell and Brandeis (part of the master plan). After World War II, they returned to Germany, but they had already established their network of disciples that were tasked with the job of slowly marching America into the clutches of a Totalitarian Marxist dictatorship benefiting only the Left Elites that will rule us with an iron fist...for our own good of course, because the rest of us are too stupid to think for ourselves.

One thing that never gets reported, however, was the rise of the Conservative Movement in the 1960s with Barry Goldwater and William F. Buckley as a foil to the rise of the Communist funded Counter Culture revolution, in order to protect the American vision that our founders put into place with our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Both of these movements had their beginning during the Enlightenment. There was one side of the Enlightenment that advanced freedom, which was the basis for the American Revolution. Then there was the parallel side of the enlightenment that was the foundation for the French Revolution and its foundation in Socialism, which later sparked the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, which brought into force the brutal Totalitarianism of Communism. These parallel ideologies are coming to a head. The result of the 2008 election will determine whether or not this great country of ours will sustain itself, or will fall to a Totalitarian Marxist dictatorship that will eventually be nothing but a colony of the UN's one world government. If a power hungry Marxist named Hillary Clinton becomes President in 2008, it's over.

 George Babington of AP just wrote the following for ABC TV News: "House Democrats are suddenly balking at the tough lobbying reforms they touted to voters last fall as a reason for putting them in charge of Congress. Now that they are running things, many Democrats want to keep the big campaign donations and lavish parties that lobbyists put together for them. They're also having second thoughts about having to wait an extra year before they can become high-paid lobbyists themselves should they retire or be defeated at the polls."

It's all about the self-perpetuation of the elitist ruling class politicians that make up the House and Senate, and rather than doing the peoples' business, are only interested in their own egotistical self-advancement. Of course, it doesn't help having a wimp in the White House that is either unable, or in my opinion, unwilling to smash down the opposition when it goes too far, just like he is unwilling to order his military commanders in Iraq to, "do what it takes" to ensure victory, like Lincoln directed Grant or Roosevelt directed Patton, Bradley, and MacArthur. When is President Bush going to publicly call certain members of the House and Senate what they really are? Traitors! I'm not going to hold my breath.

 Dr. Jack Wheeler of "To The Point" writes in his column, The Temper Tantrum that Could Kill America, "What voters did not do last November is vote for surrender and defeat in Iraq, higher taxes, more government spending, and national security imperiled. Yet that's what they got with the Democrats. And our country is in grave risk because of it. The risk is growing by the day. It has become frighteningly obvious here in Washington that the Democrat Party leadership not only is doing vast damage to our military and security services, they want to leave their country defenseless."

That's the plan—make America defenseless. Once a few of our cities have been taken out, and several million people have been vaporized by terrorist smuggled nuclear weapons, the will of the American people will be destroyed leaving us ripe for the Elites to build their Totalitarian Socialist Utopian dictatorship from the ashes of what was once the greatest republic that the world has ever seen. This is the ace in the hole if the bloodless coup doesn't happen with the 2008 election.

 Why are they doing this? Some answers may be here.
 
As I have written before on these pages, almost all American Democrat leaders have become de facto Socialists. Al Qaeda and Socialists have united together to take control of America on the basis of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend."

Al Qaeda and the various international Marxist movements, including the American Marxist organizations like Code Pink, International ANSWER, Communist Party USA, Socialist Workers Party, United For Peace and Justice, etc. have formed an alliance. 150 million radical savages will be the army of invasion that will be used to destroy the Western World for the benefit of the Elites, and their blind egotistical quest for complete power and control over our lives. There plan is a reign of terror that will make the Jacobins' Reign of Terror during the French Revolution look like Kindergarten nap time.

Our Jihadist enemies in the Middle East have learned three important tactics to win the current war and those of the future.
 
1) Use terrorism on civilians to frighten them and to break down their resolve. It is the civilian population that controls the actions of most politicians through polls and votes. It has worked in Spain and other European countries in the past and it appears to be working here in the US.

Yes, wear down our resolve one roadside and suicide bomb at a time. Couple that with a media that is in league with the International Marxists that want to destroy the United States. The Progressive Communist Left has never forgiven Reagan for what happened to their beloved Soviet Union. Taking down America is the ultimate revenge prize. Everyone in our government from the president on down has succumbed to the cancer of Political Correctness. Those terrorists that plant roadside bombs go home at night and sleep safely so that they can wake up and plant more roadside bombs the next day. How do you think General Patton would have handled the situation? The terrorists would be dead, and their homes rubble. Consequently, others would think twice about planting a roadside bomb. In addition, the Iraqi border with Syria, which is where most of the insurgents terrorists enter Iraq would be a lot more secure.

2) Control the media better to distribute propaganda so as to further manipulate the civilian population and also lower morale of their troops. Let Americans think they are still under the Geneva Convention rules of past wars. Convince them, also, that they should treat all captured Islamic Jihadists as they do prisoners under the rule of law rather than the rule of war. Terrorists would love to dominate our prisons, since they are now finding them such fertile grounds for recruiting.

Getting control of the media was one of the goals of the American Communist Party in the 1950s and 1960s. They succeeded. They also acquired control of our education system, and much of our federal government bureaucracy. It is believed that many of our career civil servants are actually behind the scenes Marxists working to undermine the United States Government from within. It's pretty damn obvious when the New York Times, and ABC News publish and air sensitive information about how we are fighting the enemy. Of course, the wimp in the White House won't order the Justice Department to find the culprits that are doing the leaking and try them, along with the media types that knowingly leak classified information to the public for treason.

Let's address the Geneva Convention issue. First of all, the US Supreme Court had no jurisdiction to rule on the Geneva Convention issues pertaining to Guantanamo Bay. The Geneva Conventions are treaties, not laws. Treaties are handled through diplomatic channels. It says so in the Constitution. Secondly, The Geneva Conventions apply only to other signatory nations to the Geneva Conventions, and apply to military personnel of those signatory nations that are clearly military personnel. They must be readily identifiable as military personnel...an armband is sufficient , must carry their weapons openly, and must not use civilians as shields. All others are considered enemy combatants, and the only thing the Geneva Conventions requires is that they be executed in a human manner after capture, and that their remains be disposed of according to their religious beliefs. The fact that we give the "detainees" at Guantanamo Bay Halal meals, have arrows on their cell floors showing them which way to bow to Mecca, and make our military guards wear surgical gloves when handling their taxpayer funded Korans during cell inspections, goes way beyond what the Geneva Conventions would call for even if they were true military personnel and not enemy combatants. After the defeat of the NAZIs during World War II, there was a fairly large insurgency among some hold overs loyal to Hitler's cause. They were referred to as the Werewolves and caused much death and destruction in post war Germany. Did we send them to "Club Gitmo"? Hell no! When we found them we simply tied them to posts in the town square and had a firing squad do what they do best.

In addition, it's not just the terrorists that want to dominate the US prison system. It's also a goal of the Communist Left that is doing every thing in its power to destroy us from within. Why do you think the Left (notice I don't say Liberals. They are not Liberals, they are Marxists) wants those enemy combatants in the US prison system? They can recruit more terrorists from the prison ranks to advance their cause.

3) Infiltrate American schools, colleges, churches and political organizations to convert as many youth and political people as possible so that new generations of Americans sympathize with the Middle East problems and regard their own country as an imperial nation, interested only in dominating the world to gain control of oil and other riches. These three combined tactics can win a war without having to fight on battlefields as was the case in World Wars I and II.

This has been the beneath the radar slow, long march toward Communism that began in the 1920s and is now being brought to fruition through Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Radical Environmentalism, and an alliance with Islamic Terrorism. It's all about an establishment of a dictatorship of the Elites over the rest of us. Notice that their arguments always seem to convey an underlying Socialist message? Notice how doing media coverage of antiwar protests they never show you any of the Communist organizers of the protests like Brian Becker, Leslie Cagan or Medea Benjamin? They also downplay the fact that many of our most Socialist Democrats in the House and Senate speak at those protests. This, of course, is well noticed by Al Qaeda and our other enemies. As a side note, have you noticed that most so called Progressives and Hippies come from either the upper middle classes or the wealthy classes? Because they never had to struggle financially growing up, they developed this Progressive Socialist entitlement mindset, coupled with guilt and fear of envy. This is the main reason why they get involved in "save the world" social causes. They feel they are entitled to pursue pleasure without doing the work to earn it, yet at the same time need to do something that reduces their guilt for having a daddy with money to bail them out if their pursuit of pleasure backfires on them. I don't know too many children of the working and middle class that can spend a year traveling in the Third World "finding themselves" knowing that Daddy's money is only a phone call away if needed.

There will be a fourth tactic added to the other three in the future. This will happen when Iran, the new financier of al Qaeda, has access to nuclear bombs. With only a few of these, they will be able to wipe Israel off the map with one attack, and cause America, they think, to surrender when the same happens to New York or to other major American cities.

Nuclear annihilation of Israel, the only real Democracy in the Middle East, and the nuclear annihilation of the United States of America is the Left's final ace up its sleeve if we don't fall to Communism through the election process. They are going to rule the world no matter what, and if it takes the death of a few hundred million people, added to the two hundred million people already killed by Communism and Socialism, so be it.

Democrat de facto Socialists have adopted similar political tactics to make sure that they keep their majority power over the American people. This is why they keep claiming that they are merely following the dictates of "the American people"! Even Juan Williams recently claimed on the Chris Wallace Sunday News Show, "Mr. President, you are not listening to the American people."

Actually, I think that Juan Williams is onto something. The majority of the American people want us to win this war, but they are losing patience—myself included. Unfortunately, what needs to be done in Iraq should have been done BEFORE the new Iraqi Government was formed. We can only do what the Iraqi Government allows us to do at this point. It's their country, not ours. If they want us to leave, we will have to leave, regardless of the consequences. If the country breaks out in complete civil war after we have left, we should refuse to come back in even if asked. However, if Iran gets the bomb and makes it perfectly clear that it is going to nuke Israel, a very distinct possibility, we would need to turn Iran and most of the Middle East into a sheet of glass in a New York minute.

The Middle East dictatorships fund terrorism through the one thing they have, and we need...or claim to need...Oil. We have an estimated 7 trillion barrels of oil in the United States. Why are we not tapping those reserves? Without oil money, the Middle East dictatorships would not only not have the financial means to fund international terrorism, they would collapse. The United States imports 65% of it's oil. However, only 8% comes from the Middle East, mostly from Saudi Arabia. Western Europe is the prime beneficiary of Middle Eastern oil, yet we are the ones keeping the shipping lanes open with our military for their benefit. Let the spoiled brat Socialists of Western Europe start protecting their own oil supply. Maybe a little less Nanny State will make them a little more responsible, and less leisure driven.

I'd have to say when it comes to illegal immigration, Juan Williams is again right. I don't know what kind of pot Bush is smoking, but I can't understand why he thinks that a bunch of illegal aliens that will swell the ranks of the underclass, will vote Republican. They will vote, just like the other "clients" and "managers" of the victim industry and their Marxist handlers, for whichever party promises them the most handouts. That party happens to be the Democrats. People claim that it's all about Bush and his big business buddies wanting cheap labor. To some extent that is true, but it's also misleading. Most unskilled illegals that work in various industries work in either the agricultural industry, the contruction industry, the hospitality industry, or the meat packing industry, if they work at all. When Bush claims, alluding to the the agricultural industry, that they are doing jobs Americans won't do, he's full of shit. Illegal aliens make up less than 24% of the workforce of agribusiness. Who makes up the other 76%? There are plenty of poorly educated, low skill, Americans who would love those jobs. I know some of them personally. I may not be able to understand President Bush's rationale on immigration, but I think I understand the Liberals'. They want a permanent supply of victims to "manage" guaranteeing a steady stream of government money into their tax payer funded Left Wing social causes. The bigger the underclass, the wealthier the Liberal Elites in the victim industries become. Not only that, they can also hire those illegals for pennies on the dollar to trim their hedges, mow their lawns, cook their food, and be nannies for their children. Yup, low pay slaves to serve the masters of the Liberal Plantation.
 

Since when have "the American people" all gone to West Point or been trained as generals in war strategy? The last time we had this type of mob rule in the world, it was called "Bastille Day" in France. Then, the government leaders were all brought in tumbrels to la Guillotine as Madame DeFarge watched the heads roll as she did her knitting. It seems to me that Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton are in a tight race to see who will be the new "Madame DeFarge" after the Socialist takeover of this country has been accomplished. Of course, when it comes to head chopping, these two ladies and their comrades may find that the Islamic terrorists may be much more successful in the handling of that job. No, Nancy, It is not like a monthly face-lift!

...and maybe the first heads on the chopping block will be Nancy, Hillary, Teddy, and Harry.
 

America is and has always been a Republic, not a democracy ruled by a mob mentality. We elect representatives to run our country, to protect us from attacks by building a strong national defense. Well-educated war strategists become our military leaders and they answer only to their commander-in-chief, the President of the United States of America.
 
Let me repeat this, because it cannot be said enough: With Al Qaeda and strong socialists uniting together to take control of America on the basis of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend," al Qaeda (AKA "terrorists") will soon be able to deploy suicide bombers in America as long as our politicians (both Democrats and RINOs) run this government based only on phony polls of all its citizens and use propaganda on TV to fool or win over voters. With the lowering of all standards today, including a misleading and biased media, it is possible that too many polled citizens could well be naïve, misinformed or uninformed Americans. Consequently, the 2008 election may well be won based upon 5-minute sound bites of TV coverage and how its implications are inferred by the viewing public.
 
Can we win this type of war? Only if our political leaders and the American people can fully accept this new type of war and understand how they are being manipulated by these current al Qaeda and Democrat de facto Socialist tactics.
 
As President Lincoln said in 1858, "a house divided against itself cannot stand." 

That is exactly what the Left wants...make us more and more divided until we collapse. Scary isn't it?

4/11/2007

Lance Fairchok, a retired Air Force Intelligence professional posted an interesting article about the mindset of the Left and their enablers that give them a pass

Where will the citizens of democratic societies find reasons to resist? Where indeed? If a recent “peace march” in Portland is any example, we are defeated already. Ostensibly a call for US troops to return from Iraq, an effigy of a US solider was burned while signs proclaimed “F--- The Troops”. In front of the crowd, which included children, a man exposed himself and defecated on a burning U.S. flag, drawing cheers from some onlookers. One would expect such scenes in Karachi, Damascus or Cairo, not Portland, Oregon. In the Middle East, I am reasonably certain, the defecator would have faced arrest. Islamic fanatics have some standards after all, which is more than we can say for the anti-Americans in our midst.

There are a couple of websites that have posted the picture of the man shitting on the American flag, with cheering onlookers as well as children watching him perform this digusting act. I guess this is the kind of example that Leftist parents want their children to see. Let's indoctrinate them into the hate America mindset at an early age, so that they too can be the Marxists' useful idiots in the future. Also, I have a feeling that in the Middle East, the man would have not been just arrested, but would have probably been executed, possibly after a fairly substantial session of torture. Of course, the Left can't see that, or maybe a better way of putting it is WON'T see it. It would destroy their "superior moral authority."

How can some Americans hate the nation that gives them so much? The protestors in Portland that day dressed well and drove nice cars to the festivities. They almost certainly live in houses packed with entertainments and appliances. They likely have abundant personal wealth, their life expectancy is long and they will live out those days in comfort, safety and security. In historical perspective, Americans have achieved a level of prosperity unparalleled in human history. Our attributes far outnumber our faults, and much of the world owes its freedoms to our largesse and restraint. So where did the viciousness and contempt we saw in Portland come from? Why do so many politicians, educators, philosophers, actors and community leaders buy into conspiracy theories, obvious disinformation and outright lies?

Why? Because these "educated" Elite asshats are the spoiled rotten offspring of the Greatest Generation, who were hardened through the Great Depression of their childhood and young adulthood. After that, they sacrificed over 408,000 of their generation in World War II in order to stop NAZISM, FASCISM, and JAPANSESE FASCIST IMPERIALISM from taking over the world. Conserquently, when they came home, they put the war behind them, and made an effort to make sure that their children would never have to make the same sacrifices they did. Enter the age of American prosperity, where thanks to the GI Bill, veterans attended college en masse, and consequently their children were expected to graduated from college too, so that they could use their brains rather than their brawn in order to make a living. Consequelty, my generation, the Baby Boomers, are spoiled rotten with an uncanny sense of entitlement. It's all about me, me, me, me...It is proven that people that have been given things without working for them, have no respect for the system that gave them those things, whether that "system" are parents, or the Liberals's biggest parent of all; the Government. The children of the Boomers are the so called Neglected Generation, who have this nhilistic view of the world. Couple this with the spoiled attitudes of the Boomers, many of whom have become the spoiled Marxist elites of the Left, and you have a movment that is bound and determined to take down this country for their own power and financial benefit. How has this happened?

If you had been “persuaded from childhood” that truth is relative and that all beliefs and cultures are equal in every way, and that all morality is a tool of religion to deprive humanity of its dignity and freedoms, then as George Orwell famously wrote in his book 1984, “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.” Logic becomes an inconvenience and history a tool to be revised and manipulated to support the reigning politically correct ideology.

Our culture has become so infected with radical dogmas such as deconstructionism, post-modernism and critical theory (cultural Marxism) that our language itself is corrupted. Communists call for “liberation”, supporters of totalitarian dictators demonstrate against “American Imperialism” and “peace activists” support brutal genocidal terrorists. At a deeper level, “Choice” is used to define the killing of a fetus and minority “inclusion” is openly prejudiced against reasonable dissenting views. In this topsy-turvy world, “diversity” means supremacy of the minority and the suppression of the majority. The same activists that condemn the liberation of Iraq demand we take unilateral action in Darfur. Those that demonstrate against the U.S. are silent when the U.N. is culpable for the death of thousands or refuses to take any action at all, incapable of discerning right from wrong or good from evil.

He hits it on the head in the nutshell. It's called Communism. The left in this country is in love with Communism. The Left's leaders won't admit it, and many of the rank and file Liberals, who go along with the program, because they have this ingrained sense of guilt and fear of envy, that the Left leaders can play them like the cheap violin "useful idiots" that they are. Lenin defined the "useful idiots" as "those members of western democracies who go along with the movement, braiding the rope that will eventually hang them." If you attend any anti-war rally you will see that the main focus of the protests in not about being ant-war. It's about being anti-America, anti-Capitalist, etc. In another words, it's about advancing Communism, and bringing down the United States government. When are these people going to finally be exposed for the traitors that they really are? Here's why I'm not holding my breath:

I have heard it said that an ideologue is someone who is willing to suspend what they believe to be true, in order to propagate an ideology. By doing so, they create a greater evil than untruth, they create an ideology that does not require truth and is unaffected by it. Communism is one such ideology and the horrors it visited upon the world are incalculable. It continues today while America’s leftist political and media elites embrace totalitarian dictators such as Fidel Castro and Bashar Assad and encourage burgeoning dictatorships in Venezuela and Bolivia. Islamic Fundamentalism continues to deliver misery, slavery and death to untold millions of women, girls and religious minorities as it has for millennia. The racism, misogyny and violence that comes out of the Islamic world is ignored, replaced by constant sound bites and images focused on isolated and often fabricated U.S. misdeeds in Iraq and Afghanistan. The reality does not fit the ideology and is ignored. The inconvenient is omitted from the news. America is painted as a “monstrous imposture.” Ideology trumps truth.

At every turn in today’s media environment we have contradiction, double-speak, propaganda and untruth. The perpetrators of falsehood speak to us in cinema, on TV, in our press and on the floor of our Congress...

Here you have it. If you go back and read the goals of the American Communist Party that were read into the Congressional Record on January 10, 1963, by a Congressman Herlong of Florida, you'll start to understand why. Working behind the scenes since the turn of the last century, the International Socialist/Communist movement has slowly put into place deconstructionism, post-modernism, critical theory (cultural Marxism), and I might add, radical environmentalism (global warming) in order to facilitate the collapse of Capitalism for their own financial reward. The goal of the American Communist Party was to get control of, and "dumb down" our education system, and get control of the Media and at least one of our political parties. Look at the world of academia, our Main Stream Media, and the leadership of the Democratic Party. Do you think that Speaker of th House, Polosi went to Syria to have lunch? She went there to deliberately undermine President Bush in the war on terror in order to help facilitate an American defeat. This defeat is the Democrats ticket to the White House in 2008. This is the move toward the UN's One World Government plan that has been in the works for decades. Unfortunately, it doesn't matter whether it is Democrats or Republicans. Both are globalists. The difference between them, however, it the Democrats favor world Socialism whereas the the Republicans favor world Capitalism. Personally, I side with world Capitalism. Socialism, no matter what level from European style Democratic Socialism to the opression of Fascist and Communist Socialism doesn't work.

4/2/2007

Here's one by attorney Ray Kraft about the Senate's resolution to force a timetable for withdrawl from Iraq:

The Aid And Comfort For Al Qaeda Act
 
By Ray Kraft
 
Osama bin Laden must be laughing in his cave, while Saddam Hussein dances in his grave.
 
In less than six years since 9/11 a small non-governmental association of militant Islamists called Al Qaeda, with the help of Iran and America's White Flag Democrats led by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, with a supporting cast that includes all the White Flag Democrat candidates for the presidency - Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Gore - have brought America almost to its knees.  Last Thursday, the Democrat majority in the Senate passed a spending bill requiring the President to begin withdrawing troops from Iraq in four months, with a "nonbinding goal" of ending combat operations in one year, by March 2008.  A week before, the Democrat majority in the House passed the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veteran's Health, Iraq Accountability and Aid and Comfort for Al Qaeda Act that sets a deadline for withdrawing troops from Iraq - September 2008.

Let's face it. The Democrats are drunk with power ever since the Republican failed to lead this country in the right direction and lost the midterm election. They are determined that the key to them sweeping both houses of Congress as well as the White House in 2008, lies on America's defeat in Iraq in order to "humble" us on the UN's world's Socialist one world government stage. Consequently, they will do anything and everything to destroy this country for their collectivist benefit.

A deadline for retreat.  A deadline for defeat.  A deadline for surrender.

A failed America, a "paper tiger" that the world will never hold in respect, is their ultimate goal, forcing us to accept their internationalist Marxist agenda. It's the ultimate example of Liberal guilt and Liberal fear of envy.

America is at war.  In Iraq, America is engaged in a proxy war with Iran, which, in supporting Al Qaeda, Hizbollah, Hamas, and doubtless other terrorist organizations and militias, intends to turn Iraq into a safe haven for terrorist training and operations against the West.  Anyone who still doubts this should Google and read The Management of Savagery by Abu Bakr Naji (Al Qaeda).

I've downloaded it, and will read it and comment on it in the future. It's a pdf file that is over 200 pages. 

America is at war with an Islamic Resistance Movement, including Hizbollah and Hamas, that intends to abolish (kill) the state of Israel, to finish the Final Solution that Adolph Hitler began.  Anyone who still doubts this should Google and read The Hamas Covenant and The Palestinian National Covenant, which expressly declare the abolition of Israel as the essential purpose of Hamas and the Palestinian Authority.  America is at war, in the pre-combat stage, with an Iran that intends to become a nuclear power, and has calculated that neither Europe nor NATO nor the United States has the will to stand in its way.

We are not just at war with an Islamic movement that plans to kill the state of Israel. They plan on destroying the entire Western World and establish a worldwide Islamic Caliphate. Our government from the President on down, seem to lack the necessary will, or "spine" to ignore the Multicultural and Politically Correct bullshit that is permeating our society, and take the necessary steps to eliminate the Radical Islamic problem once and for all. We can't expect our Western Europe allies to help us either. They are even more slaves to Political Correctness and Multiculturalism than we are. Plus, even though I'm starting to feel that our government is scared to death of Radical Islam and is trying to appease it by "being nice," Europe has fallen victim to much more Islamic influence than we have.

By voting to surrender - "withdraw" - in Iraq no later than September 2008, America's White Flag Democrats have sent Iran and Al Qaeda a "diplomatic message" in legislation that America will surrender, and that Iran and Al Qaeda and Jihadism will be allowed to win this phase of the struggle over the future of the world, this debate whether a tradition of religious and political freedom will survive, or whether the world, unwilling to resist the roiling tide of Islamic Imperialism, will incrementally surrender to the religious totalitarianism of Jihad.

Seventh century barbarians living in the twenty-first century, understand one thing and one thing only, and that is power. By sending a de facto message of surrender to these savages, we have now put ourselves in a position of weakness. They smell blood, and will now step up the violence in order to force the United States to either surrender or cut and run. Maybe, that's the Democrats intention. After all, they are nothing but Left Wing International Socialists anyway, and maybe this is their way of forcing us into a one world UN government. What's the benefit of such for them?

The White Flag Democrats have sent the message, loud and clear that, even if George W. Bush cannot be forced to surrender Iraq to Al Qaeda while he is president, the next president - presumably a Democrat with Democrat majorities in the House and Senate - will do so with all possible speed and alacrity.  Ignoring the painful lesson of history that appeasers always lose, for appeasement is always a position of weakness, of subordination, the White Flag Democrats have sent the message, loud and clear, that they will seek "peace in our time" literally at any price.

First of all, the Democrats want the surrender to occur under George Bush's watch. That way they can pull the "Pontius Pilate" routine of washing their hands of the consequences of that surrender. At the same time, George W. Bush hasn't been forceful enough as Commander In Chief in the prosecution of this war. I think it has to do with both his subservience to lacking the moral will due to political correctness, and his basic personality. If you notice, he never defends himself, nor does he draw a line in the sand and force his "enemies" in the Democratic party to either shit or get off the pot. Consequently, they walk all over him, and he lets them get away with it. It's like he's walking around with a "Kick Me" sticker attached to his backside. I think that Bush's problem, is he is not enough of a ruthless bastard to be a wartime president. For example, Why he let the Justice Department cut a deal with Sandy Berger after he got caught stuffing his underwear with classified documents is beyond me. This is a time of war, and Berger was trying to destroy evidence that a congressionally impaneled commission would be interested in reviewing as far as his former boss. It was all about protecting the "Great God Bill Clifton" from having to assume any responsibility for the attacks on 9/11. Berger should have been charged with sabotage and sedition and tried by a military tribunal, followed by a long prison term or execution by firing squad. When the New York Times published classified information about our investigations into terrorists financial activities, and published classified information about our interrogation methods and renditioning prisoners to overseas CIA prisons, why weren't the editors arrested, charged with treason, tried by military tribunal (Perfectly legal. Read the war power sections of Article 1 and Article 2 of the US Constitution), and then hanged?

Is this treason?

Treason is defined as the "giving of aid and comfort to the enemy of the United States," usually in a time of war.  The aid and comfort need not be material - it may be psychological, or informational, or diplomatic.  It may be a promise of appeasement, retreat and surrender.

It's very obvious about what is happening. The Democrats in Congress are "giving aid and comfort to the enemy" in their quest for control of both houses of Congress and the White House in 2008, and the Bush Administration won't do anything to hammer them. Why are Bush and his administration such spineless bastards?

369 members of Congress, every Democrat except Joseph Lieberman, plus one Independent, Bernard Sanders of Vermont, and two Republicans, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and Gordon Smith of Oregon, have just voted in their official capacities as United States Senators and Representatives to give aid and comfort to the enemies of freedom, diversity, and multiculturalism, to the enemies of the United States and its allies, in a time of war.  They have assured our enemies that if they can just hold out a few months more, America will surrender.  That America no longer has the will to be a major power.  That America's threats of force are empty threats.  And that, without a credible threat of force to back it up, America's diplomacy is an empty diplomacy.

Even though Islam is the antithesis of multiculturalism, the Liberals love of multiculturalism prevents them from recognizing that the Islamic culture is an inferior culture to our modern western culture. Their belief that all cultures are equal, while aiding and abetting a culture that suppresses other cultures is the ultimate example of hypocrisy.

They have betrayed the America they claim to represent and have sworn to protect.  They have betrayed the Americans they claim to represent.  And they have betrayed America's allies that depend on America for geopolitical stability.

"I _______________ do solemnly swear (or affirm), that I will defend the United States Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic..." Members of Congress and the Sentate, just like members of the armed forces, take an oath. What they are doing is out and out treason. It's also sending a very poor message to the international community. It's the reafirmament that the United States won't live up to it's promises. We fought the Korean War to a stalemate, we fought the Viet Nam War to "cut and run" followed by reneging on our promises to provide financial and material support to the South Vietnamese. Consequently, North Viet Nam over ran the south killing over a million people, with many more dying in "reeducation camps." Add Pol Pots killing fields in Cambodia to the mix, and you get the result of Liberal cut and run. This is what Pelosi and company want to happen in Iraq. It's all about achieving power no matter how many people have to die in order to achieve that power.

Do members of Congress enjoy some kind of legislative immunity to commit treason with impunity when they vote against the interests of the United States?  Can an act of Congress be an act of treason?

I would hope that there is no congressional immunity for treason, but at the same time, You have to have an administration that is willing to draw a line in the sand and go after them for treason if it has been committed. I believe it has, and I'm still puzzled why Bush and company don't have the balls to go after Pelosi, Reid and the other fifth column Communists in our government. Now you have Nancy Pelosi flying to Syria to meet with their president. Since when did our president authorize that meeting? Foreign policy comes from the executive branch, not the legislative branch. Bush should have her arrested the moment she sets foot back in the United States.

The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that "No person shall be a senator or representative in Congress . . ."  who, having previously taken an oath as a member of Congress, shall have given aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States.

I covered this earlier, but this pertains to the Pelosi trip too. She is giving aid and comfort to our enemies by meeting with Assad in the first place. It's showing the Islamic world, that the U. S. is a divided house, and that if they can keep the pressure on, they can break our will, and seventh century barbarians will have defeated the world's remaining super power and all it's military might.

In my view, therefore, the 369 members of Congress, who voted for surrender in either March or September of 2008, having given aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States in a time of war, are now constitutionally disqualified from holding office in Congress.  Even if they are not indicted for the separate crime of treason, they should, in my view, be indicted under the 14th Amendment as disqualified to serve as a Senator or Representative, and removed from office.

All of them.

I agree with Ray. They need to be held accountable for their anti-American activities during a time of war, and taken down. I no longer, however, have any faith in the Bush Administration having the balls to hold these traitors in Congress accountable for their actions. The Bush right after 9/11 is not what we have today. What we need is another Ronald Reagan.
 
 

3/13/2007

Here are excerpts from, and my comment on an interesting article by Ann Coulter. I enjoy reading Ann's writings. I find her over the top, outspoken, way of addressing the issues and the Left's hypocrisy to be refreshing. It's no wonder that she's hated by the Left. After all, they can dish it out, but they can't take it.

Let Them Eat Tofu! by Ann Coulter
Posted 02/28/2007 at Human Events Online

Even right-wingers who know that "global warming" is a crock do not seem to grasp what the tree-huggers are demanding. Liberals want mass starvation and human devastation.

Ann has a very good point here. First, let's look at the title. It's a tongue and cheek poke at a statement made by French Queen Marie Antoinette, who supposedly said, "Let them eat cake," when it was brought to her attention that the starving peasantry was crying for bread. It's elitism pure and simple. Left Wing Elites, including the granola crowd who think that we would all be better off if we ate nothing but expensive organic food that only THEY can afford to eat on a regular basis, really do want to reduce the world's population. They are fully aware that the introduction of disease and mass starvation are the most efficient ways to bring about this genocide.

...consider what noted climatologists Al Gore and Melissa Etheridge are demanding that we do to combat their nutty conjectures about "global warming." They want us to starve the productive sector of fossil fuel and allow the world's factories to grind to a halt. This means an end to material growth and a cataclysmic reduction in wealth.

Not just Al Gore and Melissa Etheridge, but a whole host of Left Wing neo-Marxists who know damn well that the ultimate power trip for themselves is to enslave the rest of mankind for their benefit. Starvation will be used to force compliance to their demands. If you don't give in, you will starve to death.

They think they can live in a world of only Malibu and East Hampton -- with no Trentons or Detroits. It does not occur to them that someone has to manufacture the tiles and steel and glass and solar panels that go into those "eco-friendly" mansions, and someone has to truck it all to their beachfront properties, and someone else has to transport all the workers there to build it. (And then someone has to drive the fleets of trucks delivering the pachysandra and bottled water every day.)

Actually, they want Trentons and Detroits, but they want them to only manufacture what THEY want to consume, and the hell with the rest of us dispensable humans.

Liberals are already comfortably ensconced in their beachfront estates, which they expect to be unaffected by their negative growth prescriptions for the rest of us.

Not just in their beachfront estates, but everywhere they live. Here I do disagree with Ann about the term "Liberal".There is a difference between a Liberal and a Leftist. Most true Liberals that I know, don't hate this country. They feel that you can solve most of society's problems with government programs, which has been proven time and time again to not work, but they don't hate this country. They really do want a better world for all of us. Leftists, on the other hand, consider themselves better than the rest of us, and therefore entitled to more, just because they are alive. It's not about helping humanity, it's about power and control. The helping humanity part is just a smokescreen. The rest of us, need to be subservient to them for "the common good." Most of them come from spoiled upper middle class and upper class backgrounds (just like the Bolsheviks who launched the Russian Revolution),where they were doted on hand and foot with material goods, had nannies to wipe their sorry little asses, and received a thorough "indoctrination" into neo-Marxism by the academic community at the college of their choice. The Hollywood crowd have "handlers" that kiss their asses up and down the street, and provide them with everything they want, while at the same time, shield them from ever having to take any responsibility for their actions. That is the hallmark of all Leftists; lack of personal responsibility. They can afford to take a year and travel the Third World to enforce their concept of "humanity" while the rest of us work for a living, knowing full well that if something happens, daddy is only a phone call away and can wire the necessary money to get them home safe and sound, pronto.

There was more energy consumed in the manufacture, construction and maintenance of Leonardo DiCaprio's Malibu home than is needed to light the entire city of Albuquerque...

How about John "Two Americas" Edwards' brand new $11 million dollar 28,000 square foot estate, or Al Gore's monthly electric and gas bills?

Liberals haven't the foggiest idea how the industrial world works. They act as if America could reduce its vast energy consumption by using fluorescent bulbs and driving hybrid cars rather than SUVs.

Actually, they do. They just want to destroy the industrial world, except for the part that will make SUVs for THEM.

Our lives depend on fossil fuel. Steel plants, chemical plants, rubber plants, pharmaceutical plants, glass plants, paper plants -- those run on energy. There are no Mother Earth nursery designs in stylish organic cotton without gas-belching factories, ships and trucks, and temperature-controlled, well-lighted stores. Windmills can't even produce enough energy to manufacture a windmill. Because of the industrialization of agriculture -- using massive amounts of fossil fuel -- only 2 percent of Americans work in farming. And yet they produce enough food to feed all 300 million Americans, with plenty left over for export. When are liberals going to break the news to their friends in Darfur that they all have to starve to death to save the planet?

"Global warming" is the left's pagan rage against mankind. If we can't produce industrial waste, then we can't produce. Some of us -- not the ones with mansions in Malibu and Nashville is my guess -- are going to have to die.

Liberals have always had a thing about eliminating humans. Stalin wanted to eliminate the kulaks and Ukranians, vegetarian atheist Adolf Hitler wanted to eliminate the Jews, Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger wanted to eliminate poor blacks, DDT opponent Rachel Carson wanted to eliminate Africans.

Global warming is the most insane, psychotic idea liberals have ever concocted to kill off "useless eaters." If we have to live in a pure "natural" environment like the Indians, then our entire transcontinental nation can only support about 1 million human beings. Sorry, fellas -- 299 million of you are going to have to go.

Stalin starved 20 million of his own people to death. Chairman Mao starved to death 60 million Chinese. Kim Jong Il keeps his people in North Korea at the brink of starvation. Castro has also been known to starve people to death. What do these people all have in common? Communism, which is the worst possible form of Totalitarian Socialism. What is the Left's alliance with? Need I say more. Hitler was a Totalitarian Socialist just like Mussolini was. NAZI is an acronym for National Socialist Party.. Their form of Totalitarian Socialism was called Fascism, which means that instead of state ownership of all means of production, you have state control of all means of production, while still retaining private ownership. That way when things go wrong, the state can blame the owners, even though their regulations are the cause of the failure.

Margaret Sanger's 1922 "Negro Project" was about eliminating a large portion of America's black population. That was why she had most of her birth control clinics located in the inner cities. As a result of the ban on DDT, which Rachel Carson called for, over 2 million Africans have died from malaria. Carson was fully aware that this would happen.

The Left Wing Elites ...are the exact same people who destroyed the nuclear power industry in this country 30 years ago. If we accept for purposes of argument their claim that the only way the human race can survive is with clean energy that doesn't emit carbon dioxide, environmentalists waited until they had safely destroyed the nuclear power industry to tell us that. This proves they never intended for us to survive.

"Global warming" is the liberal's stalking horse for their ultimate fantasy: The whole U.S. will look like Amagansett, with no one living in it except their even-tempered maids (for "diversity"), themselves and their coterie (all, presumably, living in solar-heated mansions, except the maids who will do without electricity altogether).

The entire fuel-guzzling, tacky, beer-drinking, NASCAR-watching middle class with their over-large families will simply have to die.

The selected few will be allowed to live on the Leftists' "plantation" in order to service their whims. The rest of us here in America, and throughout the world, will need to be killed off. This will be accomplished through disease, starvation, forced abortion and euthanasia. If you are not valuable to the Leftist Elites, you will need to be eliminated. Factories will only produce enough goods for them. Farmers will only produce enough food for them. There will only be enough hospitals and doctors to take care of them. The rest of us will only exist, have shelter, have material goods, food, and clothing at their pleasure. Once we are no longer useful to them, or start to become a burden, we will be eliminated.

Ann is right. In addition, what we are seeing has been slowly put into effect over a period of about 100 years. The Left is now making their move to force a one world Totalitarian Socialist government managed by the UN on us all. The Global Warming hype is the Marxist Left's "Trojan Horse" to bring this to fruition. It's pretty obvious when you now see all the wealthy Leftist Elites lining up to purchase "Carbon Credits" so that they can continue their massive energy use lifestyle, while donating to the "right" environmental causes in order to "offset" their carbon use. What a crock of shit. It's the perfect example of "Do as I say, not as I do." That is the blatant hypocrisy of the Left, along with their shameless adherence to the NIMBY (not in my backyard) ideology when they might just have to make a sacrifice for the "common good." Sacrifices are for everyone else to make, not them. After all, they are "special" and entitled to more than the rest of us "commoners" who should only exist to benefit THEM. Watch them rant about the need to eliminated many of the cars from the road and that we need to "encourage" people to use public transportation, while at the same time, trying to prevent public transportation companies from building rail systems when the proposed route runs too close to their property. Watch them prevent a power company from building a wind turbine farm, that will provide a decent amount of "Green" electricity off the coast of Cape Cod, because it will be in Ted Kennedy's favorite sailing area, and will be visible from the shore as tiny blips on the horizon. They are too "special" to have to make the sacrifices that they expect the rest of us to make.

The handwriting is on the wall. We are heading for a Communist take over of America from within if we don't wake up and smash these people down to where they belong. It's been in the works for decades, and the Marxist Left is now making their move. Let's hope it's not too late.

3/10/2007

Here's the first posting for my new section called The Blog. I will be adding to this section more often than my regular long rambling articles. Latest blog posts will be at the top of page, and will work their way down as more get written. At the end of the month, I will archive them by month for future reference.