The Left's Attack on Karl Rove Is Just Another Leftist Attack on America

Let's face it. The Left hates Karl Rove. They hate him because he is effective. If he wasn't effective, the so called "Progressive" Elites wouldn't be so quick to paint Rove as a Fascist, Nazi, or whatever hate speech description of him is the order of the day. This is from the group of people that claim to be for diversity, equality, and tolerance. Now if I was as "tolerant" as they are, I'd say that Karl Rove exposes them for the selfish, egotistical, spoiled, hypocritical Marxist moonbats that they are, but I won't. Instead, let's expose their ultimate goal—A one world Socialist government controlled by the UN. President Bush stands in the way of the advancement of their agenda, and Karl Rove is the "evil genius" that engineered the Bush presidency. Therefore, he's worse than Bush. There needs to be a good media endorsed or media created scandal in order to castrate the current administration and the Republican Party. The Novak, Plame, Wilson, Rove scandal seems the fit that bill.

However, I think the scandal is going to backfire just like the Bush National Guard memos and the Newsweek Koran in the commode stories did. Read the Amicus Brief that thirty six members of the media filed in appeals court about the Judith Miller/Matthew Cooper nondisclosure of sources case. The media are saying one thing on TV and in the newspapers, and a different thing when they are petitioning The US Court Of Appeals. I guess the prospect of being charged with perjury if they lie to the court is sufficient to keep their anti-America propaganda machine in check...for the time being that is...While you are at it, download the report about Joe Wilson, Valerie Plame, and the Niger yellowcake incident to the Senate Intelligence Committee and read it. Both are available online. I'm not going to download them for you. Use the highly developed research skills that our world class public education system has made sure that you've learned, while they were teaching you all about "values" and how to put a condom on a cucumber.

Rove made a speech to the New York Conservative Party in June, in which he showed that there is a ideological split in the Democratic party between its Elites and the average, hard working Americans, who at onetime, voted mostly Democrat. These Elites include most of its far left politicians, the entertainment industry Elites, education Elites, and media Elites. NewsweekÕs Washington Bureau Chief Dan Klaidman made the following statement: ÒWhat Karl Rove is trying to do is create the sort of Republican fantasy of a liberal, a kind of a stereotype liberal who they can, you know, launch a political war against. And they need an enemy, someone that they can demonize as they go forward....Ó Klaidman is not alone in his displeasure. Both New York Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and Charles Schumer stated vehemently that they, and other Democrat elected officials were outraged by 9/11 and voted overwhelmingly to authorize force in Afghanistan. They are right. Only one member of Congress, Barbara Lee, voted against it. Lee is a "Peoples Republic Of" Berkeley, California "Progressive." Let's look at a couple of things that Rove said for a minute:

"Conservatives saw the savagery of 9-11 in the attacks and prepared for war. Liberals saw the savagery of the 9-11 attacks and wanted to prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers. In the wake of 9-11, conservatives believed it was time to unleash the might and power of the United States military against the Taliban. In the wake of 9-11, the liberals believed it was time to submit a petition...Submitting a petition was precisely what Moveon.org, then known as 9-11peace.org did. You may have seen it in The New York Times or The Washington Post, the San Francisco Examiner or the L.A. Times. It was a petition that 'implored the powers that be' to 'use moderation and restraint in responding to the terrorist attacks against the United States.'"

For those who are interested, here's the petition as it appeared on the MoveOn.org website.

"We, the undersigned, citizens and residents of the United States of America and of countries around the world, appeal to the President of The United States, George W. Bush; to the NATO Secretary General, Lord Robertson; to the President of the European Commission, Romano Prodi; and to all leaders internationally to use moderation and restraint in responding to the recent terrorist attacks against the United States. We implore the powers that be to use, wherever possible, international judicial institutions and international human rights law to bring to justice those responsible for the attacks, rather than the instruments of war, violence or destruction. Furthermore, we assert that the government of a nation must be presumed separate and distinct from any terrorist group that may operate within its borders, and therefore cannot be held unduly accountable for the latter's crimes. It follows that the government of a particular nation should not be condemned for the recent attack without compelling evidence of its cooperation and complicity with those individuals who actually committed the crimes in question. Innocent civilians living within any nation that may be found responsible, in part or in full, for the crimes recently perpetrated against the United States, must not bear any responsibility for the actions of their government, and must therefore be guaranteed safety and immunity from any military or judicial action taken against the state in which they reside. Lastly and most emphatically, we demand that there be no recourse to nuclear, chemical or biological weapons, or any weapons of indiscriminate destruction, and feel that it is our inalienable human right to live in a world free of such arms."

MoveOn claimed that the petition had nearly 700,000 signatures making it, according to them, "one of the largest online petitions of all time, that it was translated into 20 language, covered by the world wide press, and that it was printed and delivered to world leaders." Just which world leaders they didn't specify.

First of all, let's clear one thing up. Karl Rove did not say Democrats, he said Liberals. What he should have said is, "Marxist Liberals," because there is a difference between true Classic Liberals in the Thomas Jefferson/James Madison/Hubert Humphrey mold, and the Progressive Communist Left Wing "Liberals" that are out to destroy the United States of America for their own personal gain. Personally, I know quite a few Democrats that voted for George Bush in 2004 for that very reason. They see the Elites for what they really are, and they are going to do everything in their power to prevent these Neo-Communists from gaining more political power. Most of them do not agree with President Bush on a variety of issues, and some don't agree with President Bush on most issues, but they feel that in this time of war, you put politics aside and rally behind the flag, and that extends to rallying behind the President in order to send a message to the rest of the world that we stand united. If you are anti-America, you are the enemy within. Organizations like MoveOn, International ANSWER, Code Pink, etc., fall into that category.

Let's take MoveOn.org for an example. The organization has strong ties to Socialist propaganda master Michael Moore, and to Billionaire Socialist George Soros. Both of these cretins are traitors and are doing everything in their power to make us lose the War on Terrorism. They also have many supporters in a large Fifth Column here in America. Here are some quotes from various miscreants:

"Michael Moore has a war plan to defeat President Bush. With MoveOn.org, he now has his army. Speaking to an estimated 55,000 liberal activists by conference call Monday night, packed into 4,600 homes nationwide, Moore asked three things of his devoted listeners." (David Paul Kuhn, "Michael Moore's Army On The Move," CBSNews.com, 6/29/04) Ê

"On a Monday night in late June, just after Fahrenheit 9/11's record-setting opening weekend, the liberal group MoveOn.org hosted more than 4,000 house parties across the country, at which some 55,000 people showed up to listen to a live webcast featuring Moore. It was the biggest such event in MoveOn's six-year history, according to MoveOn PAC Field Director Adam Ruben." (Jason Zengerle, "Crashing The Party," The New Republic, 7/19/04)

"War is a false and misleading metaphor in the context of combating terrorism.Ê Treating the attacks of September 11 as crimes against humanity would have been more appropriate.Ê Crimes require police work, not military action.Ê To protect against terrorism, you need precautionary measures, awareness, and intelligence gathering - all of which ultimately depend on the support of the populations among which terrorists operate.Ê Imagine for a moment that September 11 had been treated as a crime.Ê We would have pursued Bin Laden in Afghanistan, but we would not have invaded Iraq.Ê Nor would we have our military struggling to perform police work in full combat gear and getting killed in the process."Ê (George Soros, The Bubble Of American Supremacy, 2004, p. 18)

"This is a very tough thing to say, but the fact is, that the war on terror as conducted by this administration, has claimed more innocent victims that the original attack itself." (George Soros, Remarks At Take Back America Conference, Washington, DC, 6/3/04)

"Admittedly, the terrorist attack was a historic event in its own right.Ê Hijacking fully loaded airplanes and using them as suicide bombs was an audacious idea, and the execution could not have been more spectacular."Ê (George Soros, The Bubble Of American Supremacy, 2004, p. 2)

"We Are Depending On You, We Are Depending On You To Make Sure This Country Stands For What We Learned Many Years Ago When Mr. Smith Went To Washington." (Senator Harry Reid, MoveOn.Org PAC Rally, Washington, DC, 3/16/05)

MoveOn.org has accepted large donations from extremely wealthy anti-American Socialists, who are instrumental in the movement of bringing down the American government from within.ÊTop Donors to the MoveOn.org Voter Fund were Herbert And Marion Sandler ($2,505,014), Peter B. Lewis ($2,500,000), George Soros ($2,500,000) And Stephen Bing ($971,427). (Political Money Line Website, www.tray.com,)

MoveOn also claims that they now own the Democratic Party here in America. They state, "Now it's our party. We bought it, we own it, and we are going to take it back." (Adam C. Smith, "Unshaven, Unbowed And In Our Face," St. Petersburg Times, 2/18/05) The same article also states that many Democrat senators regularly rearrange their schedules to meet with MoveOn officials. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi met several times with MoveOn seeing them as Ê"A potential ally that could help them move votes and frame issues - as well as a template for the party's own organizing activities." (John Cochran, "Internet-Based Activist Group Puts Powerful Spin On Politics," CQ Weekly, 10/3/03)

MoveOn coordinated fund raising efforts on behalf of the Kerry campaign and the DNC that raised over $300 million dollars. We also know that the Kerry campaign was in daily contact with MoveOn too, during the 2004 presidential campaign receiving advance copies of MoveOn speeches and articles, and that they were doing smear campaign research for the Kerry camp. (www.opensecrets.org) You hear the left scream about how the Republicans benefit from corporate money. How about the fact that the Democrats benefit from corporate donations too, as well as from anti-American Marxist, Communist, and Socialist groups,individuals, and the governments of North Korea, Cuba, and the Peoples Republic of China? Is this a symptom of a much larger cancer? Yes it is. It is all part of the world wide movement to install a Socialist and eventual Communist international government under the control of the UN. In addition, they are trying to discretely take down America using our education system, the media, and our entertainment industry as internal implosion weapons in order to advance their agenda.

Here's the problem for them. The Republicans control the Executive Branch, the Senate, the House of Representatives, and the majority of state governments right now. The American people have started to finally wake up to the goals of these left wing anti-American Elites, and the don't like being told how stupid they are, because they actually try to save money by shopping at WalMart, or because they drive SUVs in order to transport their children and their children's friends to soccer practice. You can't fit six kids in a Honda Civic or a Cooper Mini. We are all stupid, because we live in the suburbs in order to have a yard where the kids can play, decent schools...or as decent as our public schools can be, and we commute into the cities for work where we can make the salaries that we need in order to afford our lifestyles. Most of us drive, because public transportation outside of the downtown areas is slow, inconvenient, and unreliable. In our quest for better housing and better schools, we tend to move further and further away from the cities, while we continue to drive into them for work. Some people are so "stupid" that they actually have to commute over a hour each way.

Now if we were enlightened Liberal Elites, we'd live in the affluent parts of the city and pay twice what we pay in the suburbs for housing. Either that, or we would move into decayed neighborhoods in the cities that were destroyed by the riots that took place in the 1960s. We'd pick up these properties dirt cheap. We would "gentrify" these neighborhoods causing the cost of real estate in those neighborhoods to skyrocket. This would cause the property taxes on those houses to become cost prohibitive for the families living there. This would force the poor black families that have suffered with that urban decay for 40 years as a result of those riots out of their homes and into either Section 8 housing, or out into the suburbs. We would price them completely out of the housing market. This would also create a shortage of housing the suburbs, causing the price of real estate there to jump pricing the average middle class family out of the housing market too. We'd send our kids to private school. We aren't going to send our kids to the failed inner city public schools. We'll cry a blue streak about how terrible the schools are, but we won't do anything to fix the problem except throw more money at programs that haven't worked in the first place. If the Elites were required to send their kids to the inner city public schools, I think you'd find that they would "miraculously" find a way to make those schools the best in the country just like they were back in the 1940s and 1950s, before the education establishment started us on the downward spiral of feel good, progressive, and self-esteem based public education.

People are waking up to the Leftists'' agenda, and the don't like it. The Leftists don't like the fact that people are starting to see their true colors. The Liberals, thanks to the Leftists and their Marxist agenda, are losing control of America. They see themselves heading into irrelevancy over the next few years, and it scares them. They are now desperate. They will create any scandal, real or false, in order to preserve what's left of their waning power. What they refuse to realize is they have done it to themselves. They have been able to run away from, and insulated themselves from, the problems that they created for the rest of us, including our second rate public school system and the War On Poverty. Poverty has increased by over 650% since President Lyndon Johnson launched his Great Society welfare programs in the 1960s. They have been able to insulate their children from the "dumbing down" of our public education system by sending their own kids to expensive private schools that actually insist on academic excellence. It doesn't matter that these schools are very Leftist in their ideology. They are Elitist Leftist. They indoctrinate in these kids the belief that they are better than everyone else, as they groom them for Ivy League colleges, where they can be trained to be the Socialist leaders responsible for keeping the rest of us in our place. The Democratic Party, once the party of the patriotic working class American, has become the party of the blame America first Marxist Elite, and the average American knows this, either directly or subconsciously. This is one reason why the Democrats have only won three out of the past ten presidential elections. Having George W. Bush in the White House constantly reminds them of their failure to control the American people, and Karl Rove, the President's chief advisor, is the "Satanic mastermind" behind the Bush Administration. If they can get rid of Karl Rove, they feel that they can render the Bush Administration into total meltdown setting the stage for Democrat control of the House and Senate in 2006, and the election of Hillary Rodham Clinton as President of the United States of America in 2008. It's time for another scandal. In order to insulate the Left from the average "stupid American" starting to look further into their hidden agenda.

Personally, I think that this latest "scandal" involving the leaking of supposedly undercover CIA agent Valerie Plame's identity by Karl Rove is going to go somewhere, but it's not going to go where the Liberals want it to go. It's going to blow up In the faces of the the anti-Bush/anti-Rove/bring down the administration (I've heard it referred to as a "fascist regime" more than once) Leftist Elites. The reason being, is the facts are not there. The driving force behind this so called scandal is the Left's hatred for President Bush, the unfounded basic premise that he lied to the American public about Saddam Hussein having weapons of mass destruction, and his statement during the 2003 State of the Union Address when he said,"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." The statement was true at the time. The British government did say that, and the British still stand behind that statement today. The Butler inquiry that the British conducted fully substantiated their claim no matter what Joseph Wilson claimed In his report. Intelligence analysts are now saying that Wilson's report, originally designed to discredit the Bush administrations claim about Niger yellowcake, does more to support that claim rather than dispute it.

Let's look at some facts: Karl Rove did not out Valerie Plame. She was not a covert operative at the time, She was not serving overseas in a clandestine manner, and hadn't been for over six years prior to the telephone discussions between Rove and reporter Matthew Cooper, and Rove and reporter Robert Novak. I have read reports online that that her cover was actually blown by accident years before by the CIA itself to the Castro government In Cuba. The CIA was making no effort at all to protect her identity, which they would have done if she had been a "covered" operative. If none of this is true, then Plame herself blew her cover In 2000 when she made a $1000 donation to the Gore campaign In 2000 using her CIA name, "Ms Valerie Wilson." She listed her home address on the form, and listed her job as being an analyst at Brewer-Jennings and Associates, which was a CIA front company. Somehow, I don't see how the CIA would have allowed this if she had been clandestine She also blew the cover of a CIA front, when she made a monetary contribution of $372 to George Soros' front group America Coming Together. Her deep rooted anti-Bush political agenda compromised other agents by exposing them to greater risk. I've also read things in various blog sites that she was suspended without pay for a year from the CIA, but for what I haven't been able to determine. Both Valerie and Joseph Wilson are staunch Democrats. There is nothing wrong with that, nor do I have a problem with the amount of money that they contributed to the Kerry campaign. It's their money and they have a right to donate what they want under the laws and guidelines governing federal elections. Last time I looked, this was still a free country. However, where one puts their political money helps define their political motivations and leanings. The Wilsons are definitely anti-Bush, and have taken on a crusade to damage the Bush Administration any way they can.

Here's my take on the situation: The Left is drunk with their vitriolic hate for the Bush Administration. In their hateful quest to get rid of Karl Rove, they have willingly ignored the fact that Joseph Wilson lied about both his findings, and also about who sent him on that mission. He claimed that Vice President Cheney sent him, when it was his wife who recommended him for the assignment, and the CIA who sent him. Cheney didn't know him from Adam. Besides confirming that his wife recommended him for the African trip, the Senate Intelligence Report found that the forged documents that Wilson claimed about debunking, weren't even found until eight months after his boondoggle. The Left implies that Karl Rove is a cold calculating "Nazi" out to get Joseph Wilson and Valerie Plame Wilson, because of their politics. Let's get real here for a minute. I doubt very seriously that someone in Karl Rove's position and with his knowledge of national security issues would intentionally commit a crime by "outing" an undercover CIA operative to a member of the media. Sorry, but the revenge against Wilson/Plame conspiracy theory holds no water in my opinion.

Rove provided much information to federal authorities with apparently no fear of incriminating himself. Why? Because, he didn't break any laws. What is looks like is Rove was alerting Time Magazine's Matt Cooper that it was "Wilson's wife" who recommended Wilson for the African "fact finding" mission, and not the Bush Administration. He never mentioned Mrs. Wilson by name, nor did he mention that she was a covered operative. She wasn't. Rove was advising Cooper not to "go too far out" on Wilson/Plame, because there was too much conflict of interest in the purpose of the assignment. The Wilsons were not even respecting Plame's status themselves. Why? Like Rathergate, this is nothing but another fabrication from the Left in their attempt to take down the Bush Administration.

There is no Karl Rove scandal here. No crime was committed, nor was there any ethical violation on the part of Karl Rove. The Left wants Rove punished for "leaking" information. What leak? That information was already in the public domain. This is a classic Liberal red herring. The real story here, is Joseph Wilson was caught red-handed lying about his wife recommending him for the assignment, and he was caught lying red-handed about his actual findings. According the the Senate Intelligence Committee, Joseph Wilson's findings did more to support Britain's claim that Saddam was trying to buy uranium from Niger, than discredit that information. Wilson distorted and misrepresented those findings. Joseph Wilson deliberately damaged our national security by falsifying that evidence. He is a traitor. He deliberately misrepresented those findings while working to elect John Kerry as president.

Did the CIA allow itself to be played like a cheap hand of poker in this matter too? It has been reported in various online news sites that there is a strong anti-Bush cabal in the CIA that will do anything in their power to bring down the current administration. They are not happy with Bush appointing Porter Goss as CIA Director, who in my opinion was brought In to "clean house." Also, the Democrats and the Main Stream Media are so entrenched in their collective "Bush lied" conspiracy, that they will do anything, including making up stories in order to prop up their claim. Again, it's a textbook case of the Left, in cahoots with the media, and the support of Marxists like George Soros, Michael Moore, and their ilk of blame America first Moonbats trying a new approach. However, this will go away just like all the other false accusations once a new "scandal" is fabricated. I'm just wondering when the American people are going to finally get tired of the Left's bullshit and finally bring them down. I can't wait.